Monday, April 22, 2019
A College Football Playoff System Research Paper
A College Football Playoff System - Research Paper ExampleThere are a payoff of criticisms to be leveled at the Bowl Championship Series. Although the systems original intent was to provide an objective, logical, mathematical result for deciding a teams rankings, it often makes counterintuitive and downright wrong selections. In celestial latitude 2010, for instance, the president of Boise State University criticized the BCS system for a calculator error that likely dropped the team to number 10 in the national rankings. Frequently, these wrong rankings reflect the BCSs attitude toward smaller schools from less well-respected conferences on the basis that those teams will not produce the same level of revenue as a large school with more supporters. In December 2010, for instance, the president of Boise State University criticized the BCS system for a computer error that likely dropped the team to number 10 in the national rankings. Although the incident did not disinvest Boise S tate of a arena berth, under different circumstances (given Boise States place in the WAC, a less respected conference) it very likely could have left the college without a bowl. Another criticism deals with the four major Bowl games played at the end of the college football season, into which precisely eight teams are admitted. Because some conferences have automatic bids to one of these games, these eight teams whitethorn not be the best (or even close to the best) teams in the nation. Some schools that are unfavorably regarded in the BCS system may be relegated to a less prestigious bowl simply on the basis of the BCSs sound judgement of them. Lastly, since the BCS is largely comprised of computer algorithms to decide rankings of college teams for the bowl games, it is criticized for being easily manipulated by those who control the methods of determining bowl berths. Because the BCS system leads to tremendous cash payoffs to larger schools, there is a lack of momentum in ever -changing it, which makes a financial argument for introducing a playoff system necessary. Financially, a playoff system could benefit boosters, schools, and advertisers by removing any(prenominal) element of the BCS.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.